冷冻食品工业网

扫一扫关注

当前位置: 首页 » 行业资讯 » 国外资讯 » 欧盟 » 正文

欧盟就添加剂贝莱斯芽孢杆菌DSM 15544的授权延期申请发布意见

放大字体  缩小字体 发布日期:2020-11-18    浏览次数:834    评论:0
导读

2020年11月13日,欧盟食品安全局(EFSA)发布消息,应欧盟委员会要求,动物饲料添加剂和产品(FEEDAP)研究小组就贝莱斯芽孢杆菌(Bacillus velezensis)DSM 15544作为断奶仔猪饲料添加剂的授权延期申请发表科学意见。

     2020年11月13日,欧盟食品安全局(EFSA)发布消息,应欧盟委员会要求,动物饲料添加剂和产品(FEEDAP)研究小组就贝莱斯芽孢杆菌(Bacillus velezensis)DSM 15544作为断奶仔猪饲料添加剂的授权延期申请发表科学意见。
 
  经过评估,专家组得出结论,在授权使用条件下,贝莱斯芽孢杆菌DSM 15544作为添加剂对目标物种、消费者和环境都是安全的。该添加剂不是皮肤和眼睛刺激物或皮肤致敏剂,但应视为呼吸道致敏剂。本授权续签的申请中未包含修改或补充可能影响添加剂功效的原始授权条件的提案。因此,无需在授权更新的情况下评估添加剂的功效。
 
  部分原文报道如下:
 
  Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of Calsporin? (Bacillus velezensisDSM 15544) as a zootechnical additive for weaned piglets. The product under assessment is based on viable spores of a strain originally identified as Bacillus subtilis. During the course of the current assessment, the active agent has been reclassified as Bacillus velezensisDSM 15544. B. velezensis is considered suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment. The identity of the active agent was established and the compliance with the other qualifications //confirm/i/ied. Therefore, B. velezensisDSM 15544 is presumed safe for the target species, consumers of products derived from animals fed the additive and the environment. Since no concerns are expected from the other components of the additive, Calsporin? is also considered safe for the target species, consumers of products derived from animals fed the additive and the environment. The additive is not a dermal/eye irritant or a skin sensitiser but should be considered a respiratory sensitiser. The present application for renewal of the authorisation did not include a proposal for amending or supplementing the conditions of the original authorisation that would have an impact on the efficacy of the additive. Therefore, there was no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.
 
  
 
(文/小编)
免责声明
• 
欢迎转载,转载请注明原文出处:https://www.cnffc.cn/news/202011/18/77573.html 。如若文中涉及有违公德、触犯法律的内容,一经发现,立即删除,作者需自行承担相应责任。涉及到版权或其他问题,请及时联系我们web@cnffc.cn。
0相关评论
 

Copyright © 2011-2020 冷冻食品工业网 All Rights Reserved 中国食品工业协会冷冻冷藏食品专业委员会主办    络为科技(深圳)有限公司技术维护

粤ICP备19061761号